- Maria's Farm Country Kitchen
How to Plan a Vacation
I read once that the glow from taking a vacation lasts only a few days... Read More
meat and global warming
Study: Vegetarians About to Become Even More Smug
New research reveals that meat eating takes a toll on the environment as well as your health.
Topics: global warming, vegetarian diet, nutrition, factory farms
You don’t have to give up meat entirely. Switch to eggs, poultry, and whole grains as sources of protein, and drop your beef consumption to once a week.
Want to help the environment while you improve your health? Favor vegetables over meat.
RODALE NEWS, EMMAUS, PA—OK, odds are we’re not all going to give up burgers and steak sandwiches. But that vegetarian friend of yours who keeps nagging you to give up meat has some new ammunition, based on findings from a study published in April’s American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. And even if you don’t want to abandon your carnivorous ways, you can still lengthen your lifespan and do your part for the environment by rethinking the role of meat in your meals.
THE DETAILS: Researchers from Loma Linda University analyzed data from the Adventist Health Study, a look at the dietary habits and long-term health of 34,000 people living in California. Approximately 50 percent were vegetarians (defined as eating meat less than once a week) and 50 percent were nonvegetarians (they ate meat more than once per week). The research team also compared production methods for the foods consumed by the study subjects. They found that the nonvegetarian diets required the use of 2.9 times more water, 2.5 times more energy, 13 times more fertilizer, and 1.4 times more pesticides than the vegetarian diets.
WHAT IT MEANS: There have been a slew of studies recently that make the case that overdosing on meat—especially red meat—raises your risk of death from cancer or heart disease, and affects your health in other ways. This study adds to the evidence that meat-centric eating takes a heavier toll on the environment as well. “Almost everyone has some knowledge that it costs less environmentally or is healthier to be a vegetarian, but there’s no understanding yet of really what that means until you put some numbers behind it,” says lead author Hal Marlow, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Environmental Health at Loma Linda University. The differences found in the study would likely be even more striking for the general U.S. population, he adds, since even the nonvegetarians in this study consumed less meat than the average American.
You don’t have to give up meat entirely to be a good steward to the environment, despite what your vegetarian friend might say. But cutting back could help you live longer, as well as help the planet you live on.
Here are a few ways to green your diet without sacrificing the occasional burger:



Delicious
StumbleUpon
Digg
Magnolia
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

health and environment
if the government cared more about our planet they would ban harmful chemicals on our food fields and in the air we breath by not allowing bad chemicals to be put on the fields or grass and bad chemicals to spray for bugs fine safe products for our health ban chemicals in paint too and ban harmful fuels in our enviroment like gas and oil find safe sources to run cars and buses and planes then we would all live longer and the glaciers would not melt down so fast could slow down the problems facing also any unsafe cleaning products banned.
Fwd: Amazing...
all gore is making a fortune on this global warming no tax is going to help global warming it is just more money for the government to waste how about stopping these space shuttles that are making holes in the ozone that lets the sun burn up the earth be fore the shuttles was running we had fair weather with hardly any hurricanes stop the people that make all these chemicals that are ruining the earth one day man is going to realise that he is ruining the earth for greed greed is the big problem today for man
Really?
It's not the animals that are taking up the entire American Midwest. It's the corn we feed them. Gradually converting those corn fields into actual food that people can eat would absolutely not have a negative impact on animals. Do more than a little preliminary research before posting.
Oh please
I seriously doubt you believe any animals are harmed to promote vegetarian/organic ways??? That is just ridiculous. The notion that it costs more to raise beef than grow grain is not new and how many more people that can be fed from the grain as opposed to the cows is not new either.
Our nation is in a serious health/weight crisis and if people just followed some of these principles to make themselves more healthy we could go A LONG way!
uh huh
And how many animals were killed and displaced so those farmers could dig up the dirt and plant those vegetables?
And how about some real studies, not observational questionaires?