- Maria's Farm Country Kitchen
Blog: Five Things You Find Out When You Go to a Spa
Whichever camp you fall into—or if you fall somewhere in between—here are some things I learned... Read More
sugar tax on drinks
Proposed Sugar Tax Aimed at Slimming Down America
Tax on sugary drinks may ease obesity epidemic eventually, but you can start slimming now.
Topics: Obesity Triggers, Body Mass Index (BMI)
Drink water like it’s going out of style; eat your fruits and veggies instead of drinking them.
Drink fast: A tax on sodas and sugary drinks could be in the works.
04-10-09 RODALE NEWS, EMMAUS, PA—The country has slurped its way into a very unsweet situation. Soda spiked with high-fructose corn syrupHigh-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) is an artificial sweetener that masquerades as sugar and is twice as sinister as the sucrose it impersonates. Bearing primary responsibility for the collective weight gain in our society, HFCS hypnotizes eaters into thinking they're always hungry. About 30 years ago, food manufacturers figured out that they could make sodas, cereals, yogurts, and some 40,000 other manufactured foods taste sweeterfor a lot less money than with simple sugar. They did it by developing HFCS (which is derived from corn). Sounds fine in theory, but here's the problem: When you eat any type of carbohydrate (like bread or fruit), your body releases insulin to regulate your body weight, pushing those carb calories into your muscles to be used as energy or storing them for later. Then it suppresses your appetite. Those carbs are the signal for you to stop filling your tank. But High-Fructose Corn Syrup doesn't stimulate insulin, so your body doesn't register it the way it registers simple white sugar. (That's why you can drink a few Big Gulps and never really feel full.) So what are you left with? You eat the HFCS-containing foods that are high in calories, but, those foods leave you wanting more. So you eat more foods with HFCS, stockpiling those calories like they're savings bonds, and the cycle of eatingand storing fatcontinues., high-calorie sports drinks, and sugar-shocked juices could be the biggest drivers behind the obesity epidemic. And as states like New York and Maine consider slapping high taxes on these belt-busting beverages to mitigate a public health crisis, many health officials and obesity experts agree it’s a good idea. “A penny per ounce tax could reduce consumption of sugared beverages by more than 10 percent. It is difficult to imagine producing behavior change of this magnitude through education alone, even if government devoted massive resources to the task,” wrote Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University, and Thomas Frieden, MD, health commissioner for the City of New York. Their editorial was just published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
THE DETAILS: Other experts agree that making sugary drinks pricier will lead to people consuming fewer of them, reducing the prevalence of obesity. It’s a “sin tax” approach that’s helped decrease cigarette use, says Barry Popkin, PhD, author of The World is Fat: The Fads, Trends, Policies, and Products That Are Fattening the Human Race (Penguin, 2009). “As an economist who works on this topic, a tax on sugar in beverages is the closest thing in the food and drink and obesity world to a cigarette tax,” he says. “A tax on sugar added to beverages is the best way to reduce calories, diabetes, and weight gain in the United States.” The tax could help ease childhood obesity: Research shows that for each additional can of sugared beverages consumed in a day, a child’s risk of becoming obese increases by 60 percent. Cutting obesity levels would also affect the economy. Obesity and all the related illnesses that come along with it cost the U.S. an estimated $80 billion annually, and half of that bill is footed by taxpayers through Medicare and Medicaid programs.
WHAT IT MEANS: Whether or not a sugar tax is a good idea, paying more attention to the calories we drink sure is. Back in the 1970s, Americans took in about 70 calories a day in beverages; by the year 2000, people were drinking 190 calories a day. And usually, we don’t even notice we’re doing it. “When we consume sugar in a beverage, we do not reduce our food intake, so it adds calories to our diet,” Popkin explains. Don’t wait for the government to try and tax you into slimness, though. Take steps now to keep liquid calories out of your meal plan.
Tax or no tax, here’s how to shrink your waist by changing your drinking habits:
• Eat it, don’t drink it. Get your healthy sugar from fiber-rich fruits and vegetables, not beverages that come with extra calories and contain few nutrients. Instead of apple juice, for example, you’re better off eating the apple. The U.S. Department of Agriculture notes that people eating 2,000 calories a day shouldn’t eat more than 10 teaspoons of refined sugar daily—that’s 40 grams, about the amount in a single can of soda. But many nutritionists say it’s better if that number’s even lower.
• Know what to cut out. According to the Beverage Guidance Panel, which ranks beverages from Level 1 (drink as often as possible) to Level 6 (avoid), water should be your main beverage; sodas and sweetened beverages (iced tea and juices) are among the worst choices. See a more complete list in Monday’s story about beverages and weight loss.
• Don’t be fooled by “natural” sugar. In response to the backlash against high-fructose corn syrup, some companies are offering “natural” soda sweetened with real sugar. Either way, it’s still sugar, so try to keep it out of your cup.
• Know the code words. Look on labels to see if these sweetened words appear on the ingredients list, and limit your consumption of drinks sweetened with them: glucose, sucrose, lactose, honey, maltose, dextrose, fructose, molasses, corn syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, maple syrup, corn sweetener, juice concentrate, natural sweeteners, refined sugar, turbinado sugar, confectioner’s (powdered) sugar.



Delicious
StumbleUpon
Digg
Magnolia
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Education+Freedom to choose.
I'm moving to Australia, this is ridiculous.
tax a little now or get taxed much more later
pay a little now, curb the consumption of sugar, people get healthier, cost of health care cost goes down by BILLIONS, what is the downside?
sugar and fat tax
If you tax sugar and fat and subsidize fiber and protein that puts the food industry in the mode to avoid the tax and seek the subsidies which will result in healthier products. The reason cocoa puffs have 12g of sugar per serving and only 1g of fiber is because sugar costs less per gram. Taste is secondary.
Sugar and Fat Tax
Only if the demand for sugar-filled products is elastic. For example, if prices go up by 1% and demand falls by more than 1%, then firms making these products earn lower revenue and in such a case, yes, they will divert resources to produce alternatives.
However......I seriously doubt that the demand for things like cocacola is elastic. More likely it is highly inelastic...meaning that as prices increase consumers simply pay more rather than change their consumption patterns. Maybe if you were to double the price of a coke it would significantly alter demand, but a 1 penny increase in price....no way!
Sugar Tax
Make sure we say this correctly "Behavior Modification thru Taxation". Logic dictates that I must smoke more to help the "uninsured children" and I must consume more sugar tax products to help the non-insured pay for health care. It is good for me and good for the country therefore it must also be my Patriotic duty to pay this and all such taxes..so say they! When the pass the "Methane Tax" based on farm animal waste I am sure that will be good for all of us also. They are just getting started, it would be hilarious if it were not so serious.
Sugar Tax = Corn Stupid
Sugar we digest fine. Sure we can get fat if we have too much and too little physical activity - but did ya know we don't really gain a darn thing from Corn Syrup?
Most sodas are made with corn syrup - not sugar.
When they attempted BioFuel made from corn - I had friends up north happy that they wouldn't have to "watch corn rot in silos anymore". But the corn industry suddenly said "Oh No. We don't have enough corn for such an endeavor. We'll have to hike the prices!" and soon the trickle down effect hit us everywhere because livestock eats corn. (2007-2008 for those out there with the attention span of a mosquito)
If we tax Corn Syrup instead of Sugar, we may actually get soda we can digest. Have a drop in acid reflux occurrences. Have more corn available for livestock feed and biofuel.
But I don't think that's in the cards.
I file the Sugar Tax under "You're doing it wrong"
sugar tax
What has happened to the country I used to once call home? What happened to freedom of choice? What happened to freedom period? The scary thing is people don't seem to understand what is occurring around them. Wake up America, wake to the realization that what is being forced down our throats is much worse than a can of coca-cola. We need to read between the lines and not be blinded by what is being told is good for us, but believe what we feel is right inside! How have we become such pushovers, our fore fathers would be disgusted with our passiveness. Let us the people make history, not some clown politicians who are so out of touch they have no business telling us anything! So let America have their Coke and a smile, scratch that, tax free Coke and a smile.
Sugar Tax
"Anything that is not good for you is bad, and therefor illegal."
Welcome to the future.
"1984", "Atlas Shrugged", "Anthem", "We the Living", "Demolition Man"...Same theme, it seems that what each foretold as bad has been seen as good by certain members of our government.
Tax on bad things?
I assume that since the government should tax everything that's bad for us, that we'll be hearing from Democrats soon about the need to tax pornography?
Hm...not holding my breath.
Sugar Tax
Mike said it right, THE COMMUNISTS that came up with this plan, are the same communists who came up with the cigarette tax. This is the most arrogant bunch of fools. What gives them the right to decide what I should and shouldn't eat or drink? Freedom? What Freedom?
As conservative Christian all I hear from the left-liberals is how we are always "moralizing" on everything. Well, what about the democrats- and it's usually always the Democrats who come up with these ideas, telling us how to recycle and eat right and drive the kind of cars they say we should and use 1 square of t-paper and they are so smart who needs the rest of us except to pay for it all huh?
Ever read Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell?
Sugar Tax
It's not the governments business how much anyone eats or what they eat for that matter. As for the tax, I dont believe that there is a provision in the constitution to tax people to "change behavior". The communists who came up with this idea are fools.
Post new comment