vaccine for hpv and cervical cancer prevention

Controversial Vaccine For Girls Could Protect Adult Women, Too

Industry-sponsored research suggests the HPV vaccine, recommended for girls as young as 9, could also help prevent cervical cancer in women over 25.

By Leah Zerbe

Topics: sexual health, parenting, women's health, vaccines


Women at high risk for cervical cancer, or who just want the extra protection, can consider the HPV vaccine.

Something to think about: the HPV vaccine may be a good option for some older women, a new study suggests.

RODALE NEWS, EMMAUS, PA—A new study published in the medical journal The Lancet suggests that the controversial human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine that can prevent cervical cancer can help protect older women too. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently recommends vaccinating females 9 to 26 years old, with an emphasis on vaccinating 11- and 12-year-old girls, in the hopes of establishing protection from the sexually transmitted virus before girls become sexually active. While there are more than 100 strains of HPV, several strains can lead to cervical cancer down the line, while several others can cause genital warts. Currently there are no recommendations for women over age 26.

THE DETAILS: Merck, the company that markets HPV vaccine Gardasil, sponsored the newly published study and has an obvious financial stake in expanding the market for its vaccine. However, Diane Harper, MD, an internationally recognized HPV expert, and author of a commentary accompanying the study, agrees the vaccine can be beneficial to older women. She also thinks targeting 11- to 12-year-old girls is misguided advice, citing the possibility that the vaccine’s protection will fade and require another vaccination. Dr. Harper, a lead researcher in the development of the HPV vaccine and vice-chair and professor of obstetrics and gynecology, community and family medicine, and bioinformatics and personalized medicine at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, says that until evidence shows that the vaccine lasts 15 years, it would be more reasonable and cost-effective to vaccinate young women in their late teens or early 20s.

In the new study, which was conducted in Columbia, a group of 1,900 women between 24 and 45 years old with no history of HPV infection received the three-shot Gardasil vaccine, while 1,900 got vaccine-free placebo shots. After 2 years, four vaccinated women developed HPV infections or HPV-triggered cervical disease, while 41 women in the unprotected group developed similar infections or disease. This suggests that the HPV vaccine can be effective in sexually active older women, says Dr. Harper, negating the idea that vaccination has to be administered before sexual activity begins. Besides helping prevent new infections, the vaccine may help your body stop existing infections from reproducing and causing health problems.

Small addition

In terms of my negative side effects: They only occured during my first of the three shots. The second and third left me with only a sore arm... and that's more so my fault because I tend to tense up too much during needles! lol

Worthwhile Vaccine

If you're a parent, then "cost-effectiveness" shouldnt even be considered if the vaccine lasts at least until their teen years or later; the reasoning behind this is: you never know when your kids will become sexually active. It's better to prevent them from catching at least some of these strands of HPV then save a couple bucks by delaying the vaccination by even a year or two.
Admittably with this vaccine it is possible to have some negative side-effects. Mine were a constant flux between lethargy and excitability, and I had the shivers for a while. As such, I would not recommend giving this vaccine at the same time as any other vaccines to help minimize possible symptoms.

free daily newsletter

Sign up for the FREE daily newsletter and receive a FREE gift, 25 Secrets for Healthy Living on a Healthy Planet ($4.95 value).
Advertisement